Thursday, August 13, 2009

Paglia Agrees With The River

Camille Paglia, columnist, uber-liberal, and Obama aficionado, agrees with me and this blog concerning Nancy Pelosi . . . and . . . the town-hall protesters.

She writes in Salon:

But who would have thought that the sober, deliberative Barack Obama would have nothing to propose but vague and slippery promises--or that he would so easily cede the leadership clout of the executive branch to a chaotic, rapacious, solipsistic Congress? House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whom I used to admire for her smooth aplomb under pressure, has clearly gone off the deep end with her bizarre rants about legitimate town-hall protests by American citizens. She is doing grievous damage to the party and should immediately step down.

There is plenty of blame to go around. Obama's aggressive endorsement of a health care plan that does not even exist yet, except in five competing, fluctuating drafts, makes Washington seem like Cloud Cuckoo Land. The president is promoting the most colossal, brazen bait-and-switch operation since the Bush administration snookered the country into invading Iraq with apocalyptic visions of mushroom clouds over American cities. . . .
In fact, Paglia speaks a lot of truth in her column and I recommend you go there and read all of it. The admissions will be shocking coming from a liberal, but that's Paglia.

Wow. A Lefty who is honest about the Left. Somebody pinch me.

Click here for entire column.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't read Camille Paglia much but from that article I think she has some pretty strong libertarian leanings. Anybody that writes about "soulless collectivism" is definitely not a modern liberal, since that is what today's liberal movement is all about.

Tom Sawyer said...

I have found that there are some libs who have libertarian leanings, but they don't seem to be able to think about them that deeply nor apply them consistently. And, though I think you may be right about her, it still blows my mind how someone who has libertarian leanings can vote for and otherwise support an obviously socialist/statist like Barack Obama.

Anonymous said...

Maybe it is the "soulless" part that is offensive to her. Since Messiah Obama saves souls, his brand of colelctivism may be OK.